Theological Gems from Mormonism: Jesus was a Polygamist God from the Cabal Kobol Solar System.

Some notes on sacred Mormon teachings regarding our origins from the Kobol solar system, Elohim, God's polygamy, Jesus' secret wives and children (from which Joseph Smith descended), and the argument we are all gods.

"The book seems to be merely a prosy detail of imaginary history, with the Old Testament for a model; followed by a tedious plagiarism of the New Testament... Whenever he found his speech growing too modern--which was about every sentence or two--he ladled in a few such Scriptural phrases as "exceeding sore," "and it came to pass," etc., and made things satisfactory again. "And it came to pass" was his pet. If he had left that out, his Bible would have been only a pamphlet."

Mark Twain on Joseph Smith's Book of Mormon, in Roughing It, Chapter XVI.. For Twain's complete analysis, link here.

"Those who believe absurdities will commit atrocities." Voltaire A Mormon President? A Smithtian Taught to Believe he's from a Polygamist God? Lamanites Beware!T he prophet Joseph Smith sayeth the following: Lamanites are blacks, Hispanics, i.e., any brown-skinned people that Mormons believe are not only offspring of Cain, but once eradicated a mythical white race of Nephites from South America. Hence, the immigration focus on brown-skinned descendents of the Lamanites by Mormons like Mitt Romney and CNN's Glenn Beck, whom were taught to fear/hate them by the LDS from day one.

As an ex-Mormon finally disabused of the notion that questioning church authorities was a sin rooted in pride, it was not long before I realized that this position, also common in many other religions, was designed to eliminate any capacity for objective thought and empirical thinking in its members. I had seen blatant contradictions in the Book of Mormon and church history, I saw hypocrisy rewarded and honesty condemned, I saw prophets that couldn't prophecy, and Christian charity limited to those within the church. And I saw men who loved the darkness of secret rituals and meetings, because they knew, or had to know in their deepest instincts, that their deeds were simply evil; a masonic compendium of racist, deceitful, blasphemous, hypocritical, and even murderous deeds even the most faithful member would shudder to hear. All of us, those still members and those long gone, have or had the same questions I will raise today, but the latter group simply chose to act upon the belief that maybe, just maybe, we were wrong about the church and the nature of Christian theology; that maybe Christianity never pardoned hypocrisy or embraced it as necessary to promulgate the teachings of Jesus Christ.

To those still yoked to the belief that informed and conscientious dissent is the work of demonic influences, ex-members like myself will always be the face of Satan, so I understand first-hand the near-futility of reaching out to those inside the church. Regardless, I shall try again, but for the most part, this is for those outside it...

Glenn Beck, Prove to Me Joseph Smith was a Prophet CNN's Beck, a Smithtian Mormon, to first-ever Muslim congressman: "'Sir, prove to me that you are not working with our enemies' " The Glen Beck logo compared to the Masonic symbol. We should ask Beck the same question, considering the Mountain Meadows massacre, and other "indiscretions"

To you, the non-Mormon, I'd like to present the following insights:

As long as we're sitting here trying to prove negatives, like whether or not a congressman is terrorist simply because he's Muslim, let's try proving a few negatives with Glenn Beck, a practicing Mormon and Smithtian. You see, as an ex-Mormon and not just some uninformed secular religious basher, it brings to mind the following questions...

Hey Glenn, Sir, prove to me that your prophet, Joseph Smith, was not a convicted fraud, nor an embezzler who dug up his own brother's corpse for a magic ritual and was tarred and feathered for passing phony currency.

Prove to me he was actually talking to angels, and not drunken hallucinations, when he wrote his own bible, The Book of Mormon. And by the way, prove to me that the former criminal allegations are not what led to Smith's "religious persecution".

Prove to me that he translated those ancient golden plates he found in the forest in Palmyra, New York (which conveniently, no one but other freemasons ever saw). Prove to me that the magic stones of "Urim and Thummim" which he allegedly used to do this with existed as well, and prove to me that the fact neither the plates or stones survive, or were seen by anyone other than a handful of conspirators isn't compelling evidence of a fraud.

Prove to me that Mormonism was not the Scientology of the 19th century, and Joseph Smith was not a huckster and L. Ron Hubbard of the time.

Prove to me that the massacre of 120 white men, women and children at the Mountain Meadows Massacre does not reflect the true nature of your "religion". I emphasize white simply because the massacre of no other race brings as much revulsion to your particular audience.

Prove to me, since your "prophets" to this day excuse the massacre of American men, women and children in the name of Jesus Christ, that your cult is not terrorist at its core.

Prove to me that your present prophet is actually a prophet, and explain unto me the logic you appeal to when claiming this. If I have never fixed a car, and call myself a mechanic, does that make me a mechanic? If I have never cut hair, and call myself a barber, does that make me a barber? And if I have never prophesied, and never do, does that make me a prophet?

Explain unto me, thou yammering Nephite anus- so wise in thine own eyes- just what do Mormons hope to accomplish by the practice of Baptisms for the Dead, wherein members in are baptized in proxy for the dead of other faiths, and this in a veritable masonic "Mormon" temple; without the latter's prior consent? Prove to me this not sorcery, namely spiritual and even demonic conjuration, condemned in the bible and often performed unwittingly by trusting members.

Prove to me, oh Brother Beck, that the claims of ex-Mormons are invalid despite the facts their accounts are easily verifiable and observed.

Challenge me, as I speak of what I know. For behold, it came to pass I used to be a Mormon, and I am man enough, though exceeding sore, to admit my folly.

But above all, prove to me you are not a racist, bigoted steaming pile of lodge shit as the evidence to this effect is overwhelming.

Oh wait. You cannot prove any of these charges are untrue, to me or anyone else, because if you could, surely you would have done so by now.

When Freemasonry Knocks on Your Door

The true face of freemasonry, actually, is most apparent in religions quite familiar to all of us: Mormonism and the Jehovas Witnesses. Both are considered cults and not without reason. Mormonism has a prophet that doesn't prophecy, the JWs have prophecy but never get it right; as they predicted the end of the world since 1914 and consistently get it wrong-- and then lie about it. Both are mentioned here because they were two religions specifically designed as a form of social control by non-Christian founders.

The only so-called "Christian" religions that accept freemasonic leadership are Mormonism (Joseph Smith, York Rite mason), and the Jehovas Witnesses (Charles Taze Russell, Scottish Rite). Like Hitler's German Christian Church would do in 1933 by introducing an "official Christian Bible" with no Old Testament; both Mormonism and the JWs introduced their own "Bibles." JWs do not vote, and Mormons, if they do vote, follow the prophet. Mormonism was created at the height of the Christian Anti-Masonic movement in America, the JWs in 1872, and these two key religions were created to nullify or control this massive voter base. Even then, the influence of secret societies in Congress was so deep an Anti-Masonic Party was created, and even had a presidential candidate. Among the fiercest opponents of masonic influence in government were President John Quincy Adams and those opposed to slavery; the abolitionists. The pro-slavery masons of the time, particularly the Scottish Rite, was composed of Tory British sympathizers who fought against George Washington in the Revolutionary War and later sided with Britain in the War of 1812.

In Philadelphia, September 11, 1830, at The Proceedings of the United States Anti-Masonic Convention; Address to the People of the United States, the grievances were made clear:

"That murder has been committed, is now acknowledged by all. That it has been so committed, and the malefactors have acted under such authority, and have been so aided and comforted, as to carry the guilt of treason, cannot be doubted. Protection from these crimes, is the first duty of government, and the object for which it is invested with its highest powers. But protection cannot be secured, by the ordinary means. Shall it therefore be abandoned? Shall we forego, in behalf of' freemasonry, or through fear of it, the primary purpose of civil organization?"

A Contemporary Account of a Mormon Massacre Mark Twain on the Mountain Meadows Massacre of 120 American men, women and children, including ex-Mormons attempting to escape the church, Roughing It, Appendix B Other Stuff Glenn Can, if Possible, Prove... Prove to me, since your "prophet" to this day excuses the Mountain Meadows Massacre of 120 American men, women and children that; your cult is not terrorist. There is a verse in the Book of Mormon that justifies murder when the church teachings are opposed. It reads that "It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief." (1 Nephi 4:13) Prove Smith was Christian Prove to me that this secret "Nail of the Cross" handshake is not inspired by occult freemasonry, as Joseph Smith was a York Rite mason, and the rituals in Smith's Mormon bible are almost plagiarisms of Duncan's Rituals. Prove DNA Evidence Irrelevant Prove to me that the DNA evidence discounting the heart of Mormonism should be disregarded as irrelevant. (Click image for link or go here)   Masonic Origins of JWs Not Hidden Memorial site on Jehovas Witnesses founder Charles Taze Russell's grave. Russell was a Knights Templar Mason, or rather, a Scottish Rite Mason. The pyramid has the Eye of Horus, the sign of the Illuminati. Note the same pyramid on Satanist Aleister Crowley's ceremonial headdress.

The reason it can be said with such certainty that the Jehovas Witnesses and Mormonism were created by masons as both a means to profit from worshippers and control how or if they vote is simple: they created bibles to turn Christian theology into Masonic theology. Both religions teach followers that the bible is mistranslated or unreliable and both offer their own bibles to remedy the problem. Yet neither Smith nor Russell could read Hebrew, Arabic, Aramaic, Greek, or even Latin; neither were authorities in scripture. And at the time, the Christians in America had forged an abolitionist movement that threatened the secret councils and self-serving cabals of DC.

As a former Mormon [stop laughing], I can attest from experience the following will be difficult for many in the church to digest. The first thing one is taught as a member is not to question the prophet or teachers, because such questions are rooted in sinful pride.

The very lie that expelled man from the Garden of Eden is the very lie peddled as Christian doctrine by the Mormons-- the men can be as gods, provided they eat of the secularly forbidden fruit of Mormon doctrine.

The Bible tells us the devil deceived Adam and Eve by telling them eating the forbidden fruit will make them as God. Yet the Mormons teach us that everyone can be a god, provided they accept Mormon doctrine. Thus the words of the serpent in Eden come straight from the Mormon prophets themselves! Another heresy, for instance, is Baptism for the Dead, wherein Mormons baptize spirits by proxy into the Mormon church...without so much as informed consent. It's not a joke. They actually do this. It involves literal sorcery-- spiritual channeling, which is expressly condemned in the Bible. It's why the temples are secret, and open only to members who marry there or whenever Baptisms for the Dead performed.

TIME magazine praised Mormonism to the sky as the true Christian church. But is it only because no other Christian church dares to accept freemasons at the highest level of leadership? Even a TIME magazine cover story, "Kingdom Come", notes "The FBI and CIA, drawn by a seemingly incorruptible rectitude, have instituted Mormon recruitment plans." (August 4, 1997 Vol. 150 No. 5 ) The CIA Mormon recruitment plan should be of special concern, particularly when we consider Jonestown and the CIA mind control experiments that were moved from prisons and mental hospitals to the private sector; i.e., to religious cults.

Question is, do both agencies recruit Mormon agents to the point of openly discriminating against non Mormons? And since when is this legal?

The Most Correct Book of Any Book on Earth?

In The Book of Mormon's Introduction, Joseph Smith claims his work to be "the most correct of any book on earth, and the keystone of our religion..." Note that. The keystone of the Christian faith is the Holy Bible. Thus, by definition, Mormonism is by no means a Christian faith, it is a Smithtian faith, and any attempt to call it Christianity is outright slander through Mormonism's inherent marriage to mythology.

The Book of Mormon is an account of Jesus' visit to the Americas, and his ministering to two peoples who continually warred, the Nephites (a light skinned people) and the Lamanites (a dark skinned people). These peoples, we now know, never existed. In fact, soon after the Book of Mormon was published, Smith was sued for plagiarism when it was discovered his book was based contemporary novel of the time. Yet the cult still flourished. However, the authenticity of the book would soon be challenged as archeologists discovered more and more about South America. They realized there is not one artifact in existence to verify the existence of either a Nephite or Lamanite people, but insurmountable evidence to discredit the hoax.

The time in which the Lamanites and Nephites supposedly existed was during the Mayan empire, 300 A.D. to 900 A.D. With the Mayas there's countless artifacts and temples still with us to attest to their existence, and their descendants are still with us today. But what of the Nephites and Lamanites? The Mayas make no mention of them, no mention of trade with these peoples, no mention of intermarriages or wars, no mention of them in their written or oral histories. Nothing. So now, believe it or not, the Mormons have changed their stance, and claim that these peoples "probably lived in Atlantis"!!! Yet, the Book of Mormon remains "the keystone" of the Mormon "Christian" religion.

Prophets that Don't Prophecy Are False Prophets

"...for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves."

The Prophet of the Mormons doesn't actually serve to prophecy. The Mormon Prophet serves one purpose and one purpose only: DECEPTION. For instance, whenever the Book of Mormon's countless inconsistencies are exposed, he miraculously has a vision from God, and makes the appropriate changes to the Mormon holy works and covers up the discrepancies. If not, the "prophecies" are generally church related and meaningless to outsiders, and not even actual prophecies, but mere church mandates. For instance, of some 112 revelations received by the first Prophet, Joseph Smith, 88 explicitly addressed fiscal matters. A prophet or accountant?

For "the most correct of any book on earth", as Smith put it, the Book of Mormon has since been revised, edited, and reinterpreted on what seems to be a monthly basis.

Mormon leaders in Salt Lake City, were and are all lily-white, and almost exclusively freemasons. As Martin short notes Inside the Brotherhood, "petty corruption becomes second nature to Masons, so that in the end they cannot see how corrupt it is."

The discrimination in Mormonism is something special. The Mormon church officially regarded Blacks as literal subhumans unworthy of holding even the lowliest church titles until 1978. Why? Mormons were taught, in effect, either that God discriminated against them because they were the offspring of Cain, or becuse they came from the Lamanites, or both. If you have a Book of Mormon handy, read the Book of Mormon, Chapter 5, verse 15:

The Lamanites, it says, "Shall be scattered, and shall become dark, a filthy and loathsome people, beyond the description of that which ever hath been amongst us..."

The Lamanites, in the eyes of the Mormon leaders in Utah, are the forefathers of today's Black and Latino population. And their descendants are treated accordingly. The Book of Mormon teaches that after a series of wars, the Lamanites, the dark skinned, "loathsome" people eventually came to destroy the Nephites, the mythical light skinned people in the Americas. When Prop. 187 supporters funneled cash from Utah to pass the measure in 1994, the hysteria then was that history was about to repeat itself, and that "the Lamanites were about to take over." And Utah, "Nephite" headquarters, would have none of that. Sad part is, neither the Lamanite or Nephite ever existed-- AND THE LEADERS KNOW IT. But we have a lucrative enterprise here, and greed keeps the cult alive. The leaders in Salt Lake City were alluding to a fairy tale to fuel a massive political engine. They were hating children for a myth.

And where did they get this history lesson of the ancient Americas? One day the church's founder, Joseph Smith, is alleged to have walked into the woods to ponder the true church. And he received a vision, and shortly thereafter, he found a magic breastplate and the golden plates containing the Book of Mormon. Smith claims these golden plates were "translated" with two magic stones in silver bows "festooned in a breastplate" called "Urim and and Thummim." The absurdity doesn't stop there, so he appends the claim with a little heresy...he actually claims that the Prophets of old, such as Elijah, Isaiah,or Daniel-- actually NEEDED this magical Mormon breastplate to prophecy. The golden plates? They were, conveniently, taken up by angels to test our faith.

But now that we can decipher the ancient tongues, and we know better. There was no white race to speak of in the New World before Columbus came. That's why the Spaniard's smallpox and other European diseases decimated the native North and South American populations before their weapons could. Their gene pool, after their being isolated for so long, was homogenized and made them susceptible to foreign diseases.

The Incas, the Maya, or the Aztecs never used swords in battle-- they used clubs. Yet the Book of Mormon makes continual allusions to swords and other such weapons found only in the Old World.

Supposedly, some of the last genocidal wars between the mythical Lamanites and Nephites took place shortly after 375 A.D., when known native North and South American civilizations were flourishing. But unlike the case with the real civilizations noted here; there is not one reference, not one artifact or monument which exists that can be linked to either the Lamanites or Nephites. We have only the word of Joseph Smith-- a freemason bound to no Christian religion, a convicted fraud and a known necromancer who dug up up his own brother for a magic ritual.

Why the Emphasis on the Mormon Sect?

"In 1993 the church capped a harsh campaign of intellectual purification against dozens of feminists and dissidents with the excommunication of D. Michael Quinn, a leading historian whose painstaking work documented Smith's involvement with the occult and church leaders' misrepresentation of some continued polygamy in the early 1900s."

TIME, "Kingdom Come" Aug. 4, 1997

 

There is, unfortunately, good reason to be wary of the Mormon sect. There is a verse in the Book of Mormon that justifies murder when the church teachings are opposed. It reads that "It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief." And some men, with or without consent of the church, will from time to time take it upon themselves to save us from our disbelief by slaying the one man, be it a religious or political leader. So when the CIA institutes plans for Mormon recruitment, two realities should come to mind-- the devout Mormon recruit will have:

1. Tolerance of freemasonic favoritism, secrecy and unquestioning collusion. The Mormons are not opposed to masonic secrecy and in fact practice it in the temples; and as such, once initiated into any branch of freemasonry, such as the Scottish Rite or York Rite, they can be trusted to maintain secrets of non masons within the CIA-- without the condemnation of the church for such masonic affiliations. It matters not that the very un-Christian deeds their silence and collusion perpetuates includes political assassinations and other forms of high level corruption, treason included.

2. A special susceptibility to "messianic martyr" mind control-- much like we see in the suicide bombers in the middle east. The threat that the CIA, or any intelligence agency for that matter, can more easily manipulate Mormon agents to commit even murder is a real one. One need only convince a devout Mormon agent that his faith is being threatened by a target agenda, party, or political figure. And then it's just a matter of reinforcing a key Mormon doctrine written in the first pages of the Book of Mormon, which is a book, if you recall, that above the Bible itself is the "keystone" of the Mormon religion. The belief in question is that "It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief." (See 1 Nephi, 4:13.)

The Most Convincing Proof of the Mormon Fraud? Just Read the Book

Even the countless footnotes in the Book of Mormon, when compared to the Biblical scriptures that they are supposed to buttress, don't even supplement or relate to the text in question! No wonder they're distributed alone, without a Bible to compare the verses.

Book of Mormon

1 Nephi 4:13 "It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief."

Alleged Biblical Foundations/Parallels to 1 Nephi 4:13

Psalms 139:19: Surely thou wilt slay the wicked, O God: depart from me therefore, ye bloody men

Deuteronomy 12:29: When the LORD thy God shall cut off the nations from before thee, whither thou goest to possess them, and thou succeedest them, and dwellest in their land...

Numbers 25:16-17: And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, 17 Vex the Midianites, and smite them:

For instance, Nephi 4:13 is compared to Numbers 25:17, Deuteronomy 12:29, and Psalms 139:19. Lets run by each one.

Psalms 139:19: Surely thou wilt slay the wicked, O God: depart from me therefore, ye bloody men

Here King David appeals to God in verse that He slay his enemies-- "bloody men." Or murderers. Yet murder, in Christian pretext, is precisely what is prescribed in the Book of Mormon in 1 Nephi 4:13! "It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief." (But can you imagine what would happen if the Israelites actually tried to jkill off every other faith but theirs?)

Deuteronomy 12:29: When the LORD thy God shall cut off the nations from before thee, whither thou goest to possess them, and thou succeedest them, and dwellest in their land..

Now compare it to this:"It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief." Now how does 1 Nephi 4:13 supplement, parallel, or vindicate itself through Deuteronomy 12:29?

Numbers 25:16-17: And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, 17 Vex the Midianites, and smite them:

Let us keep in mind that the Lord addressed Moses. He did not address Joseph Smith with this command, and moreover, the Lord did not imply the Medianites could be interpreted to mean anyone the Mormon finds a threat to their faith. Yet this Biblical verse, too, is supposed to buttress 1 Nephi 4:13: "It is better that one man should perish, than for a whole nation to dwindle and perish in disbelief."

Playing with Fire

Mormon leaders say their book is a supplement to the Holy Bible and contains no contradictions, but the Bible consistently warns against false prophets or adding to the scriptures; particularly in Revelations 22: 18-19.

"For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book:

"And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."

Where does Mormonism stand? They have added unto the words of John's prophecy the words of Joseph Smith, a prophet that never prophesied. A "prophet" that wrote the Book of Mormon as an "improvement" upon, and in practice a replacement of the Holy Scriptures. And in so doing, Smith took away from the words of prophecy. The Mormon missionary never gives away free Bibles with the Book of Mormon. If it's a supplement, it a curious way to prove it. They don't do it because on the chance you don't have a Bible, you won't see the bold faced fraud before you. Smith grievously polluted the sacred texts for personal gain and aggrandizement. And he knew what he was doing, as do the prophecy free prophets that are in charge of the this "church" today.

The Bible is a book of prophecies made and fulfilled. To understand the nature of true prophecy, chillingly accurate and unambiguous to the layman, you read sample scriptures in Part 3.

Joseph Smith, contrary to popular belief, was never crucified for you. He was not the Messiah which Isaiah prophesied of. Smith never walked on water, healed the sick, returned from the dead, nor ascended to heaven-- and to treat him as though he did truly demeans Christ's majesty. Smith's visions came from magic rocks he named Urim and Thummim, they did not come from God. And the Bible says nothing of baptisms for, of all things, the dead! It must be stressed that many Mormons are good and well-meaning people, and some of the kindest and noble you'll ever meet. But it doesn't make a false prophet a real one.